Non-IT News Thread
-
@coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:
@mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:
Thank goodness they took her license. It's scary that she's been allowed to be a doctor for so long!
This is just insane!
The doctor is basically saying that she shouldn't need to be literate to be a doctor.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:
@mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:
Thank goodness they took her license. It's scary that she's been allowed to be a doctor for so long!
This is just insane!
The doctor is basically saying that she shouldn't need to be literate to be a doctor.
That is not at all what it says.
-
“two file cabinets in a tiny waiting room"
say what? your patient records are in the waiting room?
-
@dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:
“two file cabinets in a tiny waiting room"
say what? your patient records are in the waiting room?
There is a lot of wtf in that article.
-
@dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:
@mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:
Thank goodness they took her license. It's scary that she's been allowed to be a doctor for so long!
This is just insane!
The doctor is basically saying that she shouldn't need to be literate to be a doctor.
“two file cabinets in a tiny waiting room"
say what? your patient records are in the waiting room?
That part is insane. Writing scripts without checking against existing scripts in a database is stupid.
But non of it means illiterate.
-
@coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:
@dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:
“two file cabinets in a tiny waiting room"
say what? your patient records are in the waiting room?
There is a lot of wtf in that article.
Yup!
How does she stay current with current medical practices and not have computers?
-
@dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:
@coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:
@dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:
“two file cabinets in a tiny waiting room"
say what? your patient records are in the waiting room?
There is a lot of wtf in that article.
Yup!
How does she stay current with current medical practices and not have computers?
She doesn't, and shouldn't be practicing. That much is certain.
-
@jaredbusch said in Non-IT News Thread:
@dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:
@coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:
@dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:
“two file cabinets in a tiny waiting room"
say what? your patient records are in the waiting room?
There is a lot of wtf in that article.
Yup!
How does she stay current with current medical practices and not have computers?
She doesn't, and shouldn't be practicing. That much is certain.
This was my point.
-
@jaredbusch said in Non-IT News Thread:
@dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:
@mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:
Thank goodness they took her license. It's scary that she's been allowed to be a doctor for so long!
This is just insane!
The doctor is basically saying that she shouldn't need to be literate to be a doctor.
“two file cabinets in a tiny waiting room"
say what? your patient records are in the waiting room?
That part is insane. Writing scripts without checking against existing scripts in a database is stupid.
But non of it means illiterate.
Could it be "computer illiterate"? If so, it needs to be stated as such, and not shortened to simply "illiterate".
-
@nadnerb said in Non-IT News Thread:
@jaredbusch said in Non-IT News Thread:
@dashrender said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@coliver said in Non-IT News Thread:
@mlnews said in Non-IT News Thread:
Thank goodness they took her license. It's scary that she's been allowed to be a doctor for so long!
This is just insane!
The doctor is basically saying that she shouldn't need to be literate to be a doctor.
“two file cabinets in a tiny waiting room"
say what? your patient records are in the waiting room?
That part is insane. Writing scripts without checking against existing scripts in a database is stupid.
But non of it means illiterate.
Could it be "computer illiterate"? If so, it needs to be stated as such, and not shortened to simply "illiterate".
One and the same. Computer literacy is a basic part of literacy. Just like reading literacy and writing literacy are part of basic literacy today.
-
literacy
[lit-er-uh-see]noun
1.
the quality or state of being literate, especially the ability to read and write.
2.
possession of education:
to question someone's literacy.
3.
a person's knowledge of a particular subject or field: to acquire computer literacy;
improving your financial literacy.In the case of the doctor, it is a lack of education and lack of knowledge in their field. Both 2 & 3 definitions, and in some ways, in 1 as well.
-
Yes, it can rightfully be used. However, context is critical. You know how people naturally assume things?
In this instance, the significant majority of people will naturally gravitate to the meaning of literacy being reading and writing as that is seen as normal literacy. Computer literacy is seen as specifically that and having little to no relation to reading writing literacy (how bazaar) even though the meaning is clearly there and completely contextual.
As a global society, we are not at the stage where computer literacy, and reading & writing literacy are accepted one and the same by the significant majority of people. As in, someone is accepted as (/marked/labelled/called) illiterate because they can't use a computer even though they can read and write.
When you make a statement that hinges on a definition of a word that is correct, yet not normally associated with it/used, you have to be specific.
Unlike words such as 'set' or 'run' which usually make sense depending on the sentence, 'literate' requires context as to what form of literacy you are referring if not meaning a persons reading & writing ability.
For example:
Susan couldn't use a computer because she is illiterate.
While it makes sense that Susan is computer illiterate and can't use the computer for that reason, it will be read as meaning:
"Susan can't use a computer because she can't read or write (illiterate)." -
@nadnerb said in Non-IT News Thread:
Yes, it can rightfully be used. However, context is critical. You know how people naturally assume things?
The inability of people to understand the language is of no concern. What I said was correct in spirit and in language. She is lacking in literacy, plain and simple.
-
@nadnerb said in Non-IT News Thread:
In this instance, the significant majority of people will naturally gravitate to the meaning of literacy being reading and writing as that is seen as normal literacy.
I would argue that believing so is a literacy problem - an inability to comprehend the language fully. Even in the most traditional or strict use of literate, that is covered.
-
@nadnerb said in Non-IT News Thread:
Computer literacy is seen as specifically that and having little to no relation to reading writing literacy (how bazaar) even though the meaning is clearly there and completely contextual.
That it is seen that way or that literacy is misunderstood is the problem of the person that doesn't understand it. We can't change our use of the language to accomodate the illiterate. How would that work?
-
@nadnerb said in Non-IT News Thread:
... 'literate' requires context as to what form of literacy you are referring if not meaning a persons reading & writing ability.
That is not at all correct. First of all, all needed context was there, so anyone that could read would know it was computer literacy being discussed. Second, literacy doesn't need that context.
You are assuming that 1) reading & writing takes some sort of precidence over other useage cases, this is false 2) that reading and writing is one of the defitions, it is not and 3) that the writing must provide clear context for a term of this nature, they do not, the reader should not inject unfounded assumptions.
-
@nadnerb said in Non-IT News Thread:
For example:
Susan couldn't use a computer because she is illiterate.
While it makes sense that Susan is computer illiterate and can't use the computer for that reason, it will be read as meaning:
"Susan can't use a computer because she can't read or write (illiterate)."It would only be read that way by someone who was illiterate and couldn't properly read what was written. If someone was literate (as to reading) they would know that that statement doesn't imply that. That many people lack the literacy level to know how to use the term literate is a different issue.
-
As you didn't supply your source for the definition for the word literacy, I went looking to fact check and I believe that this is it: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/literacy.
So with that in mind, may I get you comments on these additional sources in the context of what I posted (being that reading and writing is specified as part of the definition of literacy)?:
Source: Google search: Define Literacy
Source: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/literacy
Source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/literacy
Which then goes to this source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/literate#h1
-
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@nadnerb said in Non-IT News Thread:
For example:
Susan couldn't use a computer because she is illiterate.
While it makes sense that Susan is computer illiterate and can't use the computer for that reason, it will be read as meaning:
"Susan can't use a computer because she can't read or write (illiterate)."It would only be read that way by someone who was illiterate and couldn't properly read what was written. If someone was literate (as to reading) they would know that that statement doesn't imply that. That many people lack the literacy level to know how to use the term literate is a different issue.
I know people who are both computer illiterate and reading & writing illiterate, so my example stands.
-
@nadnerb said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@nadnerb said in Non-IT News Thread:
For example:
Susan couldn't use a computer because she is illiterate.
While it makes sense that Susan is computer illiterate and can't use the computer for that reason, it will be read as meaning:
"Susan can't use a computer because she can't read or write (illiterate)."It would only be read that way by someone who was illiterate and couldn't properly read what was written. If someone was literate (as to reading) they would know that that statement doesn't imply that. That many people lack the literacy level to know how to use the term literate is a different issue.
I know people who are both computer illiterate and reading & writing illiterate, so my example stands.
These days I’d expect them to go together.
