Newb: Looking for advice.
-
@notverypunny said in Newb: Looking for advice.:
So my initial comment was meant to be more tongue-in-cheek than anything, I wasn't trying to bash or belittle anyone, my apologies if it wasn't taken as intended.
No offense taken, the team I work with is vicious, no holds barred, prepare to be nuked at any moment.
-
- Why does the outgoing person have such an anti-cloud bias
- What does management mean by "get to the cloud".
-
Crusty old bastard that doesn't like change..... Learning something new is not in the playbook.
-
It seems to me to be a keep up with the Jones's, this looks good at our mixed group meetings. I think its just a word that sounds cool. I will be digging into it more soon.
-
@popester said in Newb: Looking for advice.:
Is moving to a colo and calling it "cloud" solve the political problem?
@popester said in Newb: Looking for advice.:
- Why does the outgoing person have such an anti-cloud bias
- What does management mean by "get to the cloud".
-
Crusty old bastard that doesn't like change..... Learning something new is not in the playbook.
-
It seems to me to be a keep up with the Jones's, this looks good at our mixed group meetings. I think its just a word that sounds cool. I will be digging into it more soon.
So - according to the bold points above - there really isn't any understanding on what moving to the cloud means. You really have to start there. You need to pin management down on what they want - what the goal is. Get them to admit - they heard this 'cool' term cloud and how all the cool kids are doing it, and they assumed they needed to as well. Assuming they do admit that - then ask them, if you don't know what it is, then how can you say you want to do that? Wouldn't it be better to learn what it is and if it even applies to their business?
Is there a pain point they have today they are trying to solve? -
The information you've given helps explain the current IT reality of the company. My concern would be that if management has SaaS in mind as opposed to migrating the existing workloads then looking at colo would seem to be a moot point. You've mentioned Citrix, which makes me wonder if they're looking to do Citrix Cloud.
We have looked at citrix cloud. We have been getting feedback that it is not quite ready for prime-time. I think we are planning on looking at it again this winter to see if it is an option. With all this new information I have a lot to think about.
-
Yep, but our main / lead Citrx guy here has been back and forth with their support trying to get acceptable performance compared to our on-prem setup. We're looking at the possibility of using it for XenDesktop in a DR capacity, but from what I've been hearing the performance isn't even acceptable from a temporary / DR perspective.
This is exactly what we have been hearing about it.
-
So - according to the bold points above - there really isn't any understanding on what moving to the cloud means. You really have to start there. You need to pin management down on what they want - what the goal is. Get them to admit - they heard this 'cool' term cloud and how all the cool kids are doing it, and they assumed they needed to as well. Assuming they do admit that - then ask them, if you don't know what it is, then how can you say you want to do that? Wouldn't it be better to learn what it is and if it even applies to their business?
Is there a pain point they have today they are trying to solve?I would have to agree, that is my first hurdle. Find the why, then the how.
Thank you.
-
@popester said in Newb: Looking for advice.:
My next adventure is to study up on what the architecture would look like with moving our data center to a colo.
Same as on prem. Colo is a location, not an architecture.
-
@popester said in Newb: Looking for advice.:
Is moving to a colo and calling it "cloud" solve the political problem?
If it doesn't, what would? Nothing is more "the cloud" than this. If this doesn't count, literally nothing would.
-
@popester said in Newb: Looking for advice.:
Crusty old bastard that doesn't like change..... Learning something new is not in the playbook.
Nothing new there. Hosting is a 1960s thing. No one is that old (in this industry.)
-
@popester said in Newb: Looking for advice.:
It seems to me to be a keep up with the Jones's, this looks good at our mixed group meetings. I think its just a word that sounds cool. I will be digging into it more soon.
Tell them to just say it then, everyone has been on "the cloud" for decades now.
-
@popester said in Newb: Looking for advice.:
The information you've given helps explain the current IT reality of the company. My concern would be that if management has SaaS in mind as opposed to migrating the existing workloads then looking at colo would seem to be a moot point. You've mentioned Citrix, which makes me wonder if they're looking to do Citrix Cloud.
We have looked at citrix cloud. We have been getting feedback that it is not quite ready for prime-time. I think we are planning on looking at it again this winter to see if it is an option. With all this new information I have a lot to think about.
This seems crazy. A vendor with zero reason to have looked at in any way, to provide a service that appears to have no value, that isn't ready for consumption....
This feels like total insanity. I can't think of any logical reason to consider talking to them. It's like asking your cat to run your hosting service.... just randomly picking the least likely person and poking them asking over and over again if they've found a way to take your rmoney yet.
-
@scottalanmiller Thank you sir. Your and everyone's input is valued and appreciated.
