Miscellaneous Tech News
-
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
GLPI ITSM 9.4.0
https://glpi-project.org/glpi-9-4-0/I used GLPI before switching to Spiceworks at my last job. From what I remember, it wasn't terrible... I'll have to give this one another go.
-
@dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
GLPI ITSM 9.4.0
https://glpi-project.org/glpi-9-4-0/I used GLPI before switching to Spiceworks at my last job. From what I remember, it wasn't terrible... I'll have to give this one another go.
I've also used it before switching to Snipe-IT mainly because of the check-in/check-out feature.
-
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
GLPI ITSM 9.4.0
https://glpi-project.org/glpi-9-4-0/I used GLPI before switching to Spiceworks at my last job. From what I remember, it wasn't terrible... I'll have to give this one another go.
I've also used it before switching to Snipe-IT mainly because of the check-in/check-out feature.
Currently using snipe-it. It is great. The one thing spiceworks has is the automated scanning. This mostly works, but also can cause network issues and is kind of clunky. I actually use both, but only use sw to fill in certain gaps.
-
@wrx7m said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
GLPI ITSM 9.4.0
https://glpi-project.org/glpi-9-4-0/I used GLPI before switching to Spiceworks at my last job. From what I remember, it wasn't terrible... I'll have to give this one another go.
I've also used it before switching to Snipe-IT mainly because of the check-in/check-out feature.
Currently using snipe-it. It is great. The one thing spiceworks has is the automated scanning. This mostly works, but also can cause network issues and is kind of clunky. I actually use both, but only use sw to fill in certain gaps.
I haven't used them for a long time now but, Fusion Inventory or OCS can also automatically scan to and then add the info to GLPI. If I remember correctly they require installing an agent to the computers for them to work.
-
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
GLPI
I don't mind having an agent. SW uses agents for remote systems. PDQ Inventory does too, or will. I am using PDQ deploy and would like to have the integration that comes with the inventory aspect.
-
@wrx7m said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
GLPI
I don't mind having an agent. SW uses agents for remote systems. PDQ Inventory does too, or will. I am using PDQ deploy and would like to have the integration that comes with the inventory aspect.
I prefer agents. Slightly more work overall, but consistent results and no weird troubleshooting.
-
Even when I used SW, I used it with all agents.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Even when I used SW, I used it with all agents.
I find that for inventory and stuff like that, Agents are usually more accurate and less resource intensive than reaching out to scan from the server.
-
-
@dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Even when I used SW, I used it with all agents.
I find that for inventory and stuff like that, Agents are usually more accurate and less resource intensive than reaching out to scan from the server.
For the server but for the computer it is more intensive... however I do like when something scans the network for me instead of an agent. There were certain devices added that sometimes do not get agents and so I like that part when there is a networks scan.
-
@dbeato said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@dafyre said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Even when I used SW, I used it with all agents.
I find that for inventory and stuff like that, Agents are usually more accurate and less resource intensive than reaching out to scan from the server.
For the server but for the computer it is more intensive... however I do like when something scans the network for me instead of an agent. There were certain devices added that sometimes do not get agents and so I like that part when there is a networks scan.
Being able to do both is usually a good approach, IMO. When you scan the network, check for an agent. If the agent is found, trigger an inventory update. If the agent ain't found, try to inventory it yourself, or at least alert somebody to put the agent on.
-
Zimbra 8.8.11 and 8.7.11 Patches
https://blog.zimbra.com/2019/02/new-zimbra-patches-8-8-11-patch-2-and-8-8-10-patch-6-and-8-7-11-patch-8/ -
Snipe-IT 5.0.0-Beta-1.1 is out with a lot of changes and improvements.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Snipe-IT 5.0.0-Beta-1.1 is out with a lot of changes and improvements.
I can’t wait for the release.
Planning on testing the beta or wait for the stable release?
-
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@DustinB3403 said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Snipe-IT 5.0.0-Beta-1.1 is out with a lot of changes and improvements.
I can’t wait for the release.
Planning on testing the beta or wait for the stable release?
I only run stable.
-
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@DustinB3403 said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Snipe-IT 5.0.0-Beta-1.1 is out with a lot of changes and improvements.
I can’t wait for the release.
Planning on testing the beta or wait for the stable release?
The one feature that will be extremely useful to me is the custom asset report addition for the "fully depreciation" value. As it is now, we're guestimating when an asset is due for upgrade based on an Excel spreadsheet.
-
Toms hardware encourages people to actively avoid activating Windows
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/get-windows-10-free-or-cheap,5717.htmlIf you don't have a valid key, you can still use Windows 10 on your PC even if you don’t activate the OS. I’ve spoken with colleagues who have used non-activated versions of Windows for years without Microsoft ever shutting it down. In this way, you can have Windows 10 Home or Pro running on your PC nearly flawlessly. Nearly.
-
@nadnerB said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Toms hardware encourages people to actively avoid activating Windows
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/get-windows-10-free-or-cheap,5717.htmlIf you don't have a valid key, you can still use Windows 10 on your PC even if you don’t activate the OS. I’ve spoken with colleagues who have used non-activated versions of Windows for years without Microsoft ever shutting it down. In this way, you can have Windows 10 Home or Pro running on your PC nearly flawlessly. Nearly.
Nothing wrong with not activating. Not aware of the EULA requiring that. They aren't suggesting that it not be licensed, just not activated. Very different things.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@nadnerB said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
Toms hardware encourages people to actively avoid activating Windows
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/get-windows-10-free-or-cheap,5717.htmlIf you don't have a valid key, you can still use Windows 10 on your PC even if you don’t activate the OS. I’ve spoken with colleagues who have used non-activated versions of Windows for years without Microsoft ever shutting it down. In this way, you can have Windows 10 Home or Pro running on your PC nearly flawlessly. Nearly.
Nothing wrong with not activating. Not aware of the EULA requiring that. They aren't suggesting that it not be licensed, just not activated. Very different things.
It does require activation:
So if you are not properly licensed AND activated, you are not authorized to use the software (Windows 10).
-
Yeah Tom's Hardware people are just endorsing theft of software from Microsoft. Just because you can do something doesn't mean you're allowed too.
We've discussed this same thing here on ML. Like with IT Administrators who want to setup 3 Installations of Windows Server X using their Standard license.
You're allowed 2 installations, and that is all. Either 1 to the bare metal and 1 VM on the same hardware. Or 2 installations as VMs on the same hardware.
This is nothing different besides the fact that they're stating the licensing "doesn't apply because we haven't been stopped for all of this time".
